Hyaluronic acid fillers as injectable biomaterials

Relationships among network architecture, rheology, and hyaluronidase response

Authors

  • Mariucha Marcon Nemer State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67463/b9ekmt47

Keywords:

hyaluronic acid fillers, injectable biomaterials, rheology, hyaluronidase, crosslinked hyaluronic acid, network architecture

Abstract

Objective: To critically reinterpret contemporary evidence on hyaluronic acid fillers through a biomaterials framework that links network architecture, rheology, and hyaluronidase response.

Sources and interpretive strategy: This narrative review prioritized comparative and material-characterization studies published between 2018 and 2026, with greater interpretive weight assigned to studies that compared technological platforms and reported analytically useful physicochemical or degradation data.

Synthesis: Available evidence consistently shows that hyaluronic acid fillers are materially heterogeneous. Differences in crosslinking chemistry, molecular-weight composition, gel-phase organization, cohesivity, and viscoelastic profile translate into non-equivalent dissolution patterns under standardized hyaluronidase exposure. Susceptibility to hyaluronidase cannot be inferred from a single rheological parameter or from commercial taxonomy alone; it emerges from the interaction among network architecture, gel concentration, crosslink density and distribution, and experimental variables such as enzyme source, dose, dilution, exposure time, and readout method.

Conclusion: Current evidence supports a materially explicit reading of filler performance and argues against treating enzymatic reversibility as a generic class property. Further progress will depend on more standardized and auditable study designs integrating advanced rheology, microstructural characterization, and reproducible degradation assays.

Author Biography

  • Mariucha Marcon Nemer, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil

    Mariucha Marcon Nemer holds a degree in Dentistry from the State University of Maringá (UEM), specialization training in Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry from the Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FOB/USP), and a master’s degree in Integrated Dentistry from UEM. She is currently a PhD candidate at the State University of Maringá. Her academic and research interests include Esthetic Dentistry, Botulinum Toxin, Hyaluronic Acid, Cosmetic Dermatology, Orofacial Harmonization, and the scientific and clinical foundations of injectable biomaterials.

References

Wu GT, Kam J, Bloom JD. Hyaluronic acid basics and rheology. Clin Plast Surg. 2023;50(3):391-8. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2022.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2022.12.004

Fontenete S, Bravo C, Alfertshofer M, Cotofana S. Understanding clinical and biophysical differences between non-cross-linked and cross-linked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026;25(1):e70595. doi:10.1111/jocd.70595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.70595

Hong GW, Wan J, Park Y, Chang K, Chan LKW, Lee KWA, et al. Rheological characteristics of hyaluronic acid fillers as viscoelastic substances. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(16):2386. doi:10.3390/polym16162386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162386

Puljic A, Frank K, Cohen J, Otto K, Mayr J, Hugh-Bloch A, et al. A scientific framework for comparing hyaluronic acid filler crosslinking technologies. Gels. 2025;11(7):487. doi:10.3390/gels11070487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11070487

Zerbinati N, Sommatis S, Maccario C, Capillo MC, Grimaldi G, Alonci G, et al. Comparative physicochemical analysis among 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether crosslinked hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Gels. 2021;7(3):139. doi:10.3390/gels7030139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7030139

Zerbinati N, Sommatis S, Maccario C, Capillo MC, Grimaldi G, Alonci G, et al. Toward physicochemical and rheological characterization of different injectable hyaluronic acid dermal fillers cross-linked with polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(6):948. doi:10.3390/polym13060948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060948

Buhren BA, Schrumpf H, Bolke E, Kammers K, Gerber PA. Standardized in vitro analysis of the degradability of hyaluronic acid fillers by hyaluronidase. Eur J Med Res. 2018;23(1):37. doi:10.1186/s40001-018-0334-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0334-9

Ryu C, Lu JE, Zhang-Nunes S. Response of twelve different hyaluronic acid gels to varying doses of recombinant human hyaluronidase. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(4):881-9. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.051

Zhang-Nunes S, Ryu C, Cahill K, Straka D, Nabavi C, Czyz C, et al. Prospective in vivo evaluation of three different hyaluronic acid gels to varying doses of hyaluronidase with long-term follow-up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(4):874-80. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.052

Mehta P, Ryu C, Park K, Kherani F, Zhang-Nunes S. Response of five different hyaluronic acid gels to varying doses of recombinant human hyaluronidase. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;76:298-300. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.043

Faivre J, Wu K, Gallet M, Sparrow J, Bourdon F, Gallagher CJ. Comparison of hyaluronidase-mediated degradation kinetics of commercially available hyaluronic acid fillers in vitro. Aesthet Surg J. 2024;44(6):NP402-10. doi:10.1093/asj/sjae032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae032

Germani M, de Queiroz MVGB, Shimizu MYF, Teixeira TG, Rogerio V, Giro G, et al. Comparative in-vitro degradation of hyaluronic acids exposed to different hyaluronidase enzymes. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025;15:178-82. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.001

Sudharshan R, Davuluru SS, Shen AJ, Gupta S, Saeedi N, Woodward J, et al. Identifying minimum single dose of recombinant human hyaluronidase for in vitro dissolution of twenty-two hyaluronic acid fillers. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;41(6):657-63. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000002941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002941

Oliveira J, Santos V, Marques J, Silva N, Mata A, Brito da Cruz M. Effectiveness of hyaluronidase on hyaluronic acid degradation: an experimental study. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025;7:ojaf108. doi:10.1093/asjof/ojaf108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf108

Safran T, Khalaf R, Metelitsa A, Woodward J, Nikolis A. Comparison of the degradability of hyaluronic acid by ovine and recombinant human hyaluronidase. Aesthet Surg J. 2025;45(10):1086-93. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaf127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf127

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

1.
Nemer MM. Hyaluronic acid fillers as injectable biomaterials: Relationships among network architecture, rheology, and hyaluronidase response. J Digit Health Adv Biomater [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 29 [cited 2026 Jul. 2];1(1):14–24. Available from: https://test.journal.jdhab.org/index.php/jhab/article/view/hyaluronic-acid-fillers-rheology-hyaluronidase-response