TRACE-S: provenance and traceability of bibliographic searches in health research—methodological specification and exploratory documentary application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67463/hnah8p72Keywords:
Information retrieval, Data provenance, Reproducibility, Bibliographic databases, Search strategy, Health informaticsAbstract
Objective: To specify Traceability in Scientific Search (TRACE-S) and examine its exploratory application to documenting the provenance of bibliographic searches.
Methods: The specification was applied to three PubMed query versions concerning artificial intelligence and periapical lesions. V01 and V02 did not restrict search fields; V03 limited the search to title and abstract (Title/Abstract) and was repeated by the same agent. No date, language, species, or study-design filters were applied. Four executions were reconciled by PubMed identifier (PMID). The 20 lowest-numbered PMIDs were examined using artificial intelligence-assisted extraction followed by human verification. The internal integrity of the records was subsequently checked.
Results: TRACE-S comprises six operational stages, seven documentary categories, and the Scientific Search Quality Checklist (SSQC-15), an unvalidated preliminary checklist. The four executions retrieved 123, 134, 127, and 127 records, corresponding to 134 unique PMIDs and 511 execution–document associations. Of the 20 records examined, seven were operationally included, eleven were excluded, and two remained unresolved; five inclusions relied on contextual inference. The audit confirmed the internal consistency of the retrieved sets, documentary links, and recorded history.
Conclusion: The preserved dataset showed reconciliation and internal traceability across queries, executions, records, and eligibility judgments. The validity of the judgments, independent reconstruction, superiority over existing approaches, and validity of the SSQC-15 were not demonstrated.
References
Rethlefsen ML, Brigham TJ, Price C, Moher D, Bouter LM, Kirkham JJ, et al. Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024;166:111229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111229.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al.; PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
Haddaway NR, Rethlefsen ML, Davies M, Glanville J, McGowan B, Nyhan K, et al. A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022;18(4):e1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1288.
Lebo T, Sahoo S, McGuinness D, editors. PROV-O: the PROV ontology [Internet]. W3C Recommendation. 2013 Apr 30 [cited 2026 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/.
Gonçalves L. Canvas TRAMA para delimitação do escopo da pesquisa: workbook metodológico em sete etapas. Version 2.0.5. Maringá: Scientexa Editora; 2026.
Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Featherstone R, Littlewood A, Metzendorf MI, et al. Searching for and selecting studies [updated 2025 Mar]. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. Version 6.5.1. Cochrane; 2025 [cited 2026 Oct 28]. Chapter 4. Available from: https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04.
MacFarlane A, Russell-Rose T, Shokraneh F. Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: issues, challenges and opportunities. Intell Syst Appl. 2022;15:200091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200091.
Briscoe S. Errors to avoid when searching for studies for systematic reviews: a guide for nurse researchers. Int J Older People Nurs. 2023;18(3):e12533. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12533.
National Library of Medicine (US). PubMed user guide [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine; [updated 2026 Sep 30; cited 2026 Oct 28]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/help/.
National Library of Medicine (US). The 9 E-utilities and associated parameters. In: The insider’s guide to accessing NLM data [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine; [cited 2026 Oct 28]. Available from: https://dataguide.nlm.nih.gov/eutilities/utilities.html.
National Center for Biotechnology Information (US). The E-utilities in-depth: parameters, syntax and more. In: Entrez programming utilities help [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine; [cited 2026 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25499/.
Moidu NP, Sharma S, Chawla A, Kumar V, Logani A. Deep learning for categorization of endodontic lesion based on radiographic periapical index scoring system. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):651–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04043-y.
Kirnbauer B, Hadzic A, Jakse N, Bischof H, Stern D. Automatic detection of periapical osteolytic lesions on cone-beam computed tomography using deep convolutional neuronal networks. J Endod. 2022;48(11):1434–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.07.013.
Setzer FC, Shi KJ, Zhang Z, Yan H, Yoon H, Mupparapu M, et al. Artificial intelligence for the computer-aided detection of periapical lesions in cone-beam computed tomographic images. J Endod. 2020;46(7):987–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.025.
Ezhov M, Gusarev M, Golitsyna M, Yates JM, Kushnerev E, Tamimi D, et al. Clinically applicable artificial intelligence system for dental diagnosis with CBCT. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94093-9.
Zadrożny Ł, Regulski P, Brus-Sawczuk K, Czajkowska M, Parkanyi L, Ganz S, et al. Artificial intelligence application in assessment of panoramic radiographs. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(1):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010224.
Calazans MAA, Ferreira FABS, Alcoforado MLMG, Santos AD, Pontual ADA, Madeiro F. Automatic classification system for periapical lesions in cone-beam computed tomography. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(17):6481. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176481.
Ari T, Sağlam H, Öksüzoğlu H, Kazan O, Bayrakdar İŞ, Duman SB, et al. Automatic feature segmentation in dental periapical radiographs. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(12):3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123081.
Orhan K, Bayrakdar IS, Ezhov M, Kravtsov A, Özyürek T. Evaluation of artificial intelligence for detecting periapical pathosis on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Int Endod J. 2020;53(5):680–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13265.
Bayrakdar IS, Orhan K, Çelik Ö, Bilgir E, Sağlam H, Kaplan FA, et al. A U-Net approach to apical lesion segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:7035367. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7035367.
Lin L, Xing X, Wu C, Chen Y, Tong J, McClelland DJ, et al. Reproducible study identification and selection in systematic reviews: barriers and paths forward. BMJ Open. 2026;16(9):e123460. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-123460.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
The documentary package made available for confidential editorial inspection contains PubMed query expressions, ESearch/EFetch responses, documentary relationships, and eligibility judgment history. Supplement 1 describes the optional Canvas TRAMA–TRACE-S interface; Supplement 2 documents the 20 eligibility judgments. Some full texts and original screening forms were not available in the audited package. Public release or transmission of the identified documentary package to reviewers requires authorization from the responsible custodians. No public repository for the complete package is specified in the manuscript.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Robson Brandão, Lígia Ferreira Gomes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant the Journal of Digital Health and Advanced Biomaterials (JDHAB) the right of first publication and a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, preserve, archive, and identify the article as the original publication.
The CC BY 4.0 license permits sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation of the published work for any purpose, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors, the original publication in JDHAB is properly cited, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
The granting of publication rights to JDHAB does not transfer copyright ownership from the authors.
